As a close for the year/as a start to the year, I thought I might discuss a successful mini PBL (project based learning) I tried out before the winter break began! My students have just about finished chemistry and I thought it might be fun to have the students come up with the review game for a change! Below you will find a summary of the week(ish) long project as well as some examples of what they created!
PBL’s are a great way to get your students engaged in an over-arching topic. I received training on using PBL’s in the classroom last year through the Buck Institute for Education. Although a typical PBL should be at least 6 weeks long, I tend to do shorter PBL’s (about a week or a week and a half) as they work better for me and my classroom.
I told my students on the first day that the table groups they were sitting in now served as their new gaming start-ups and their task was to create an educational chemistry game. At the end, “investors” would come in and one group would be selected as the game that the investors would like to produce and sell. The winning team won classroom tickets for our class drawings (a coveted prize).
DAY 1- (teacher lead)
In preparation for the project, I assigned homework the night before we began to do a write-up on their favorite game to play and a description of why. To start things off, they shared their favorite games with the people at their table groups. Once everyone had gone, we discussed the games as a class. We determined common themes among the games that were favorites among the students (such as cooperative, competitive, hands-on, imagination based, entertainment vs. educational, etc). Groups then randomly picked a chemistry topic that their games would use as a central theme. Once groups and topics were assigned, I handed out a sheet giving guidelines on brainstorming. Students first silently brainstormed on their own for 5 minutes. Then, students were to share their brainstorming with their group and then brainstorm together for another 5 minutes. Following the brainstorming session, students were to discuss the ideas they had. Finally, after thoughtful deliberation, they were to choose what their game would be.
DAYS 2-6 (student lead)
Once student groups had determined what their game would be, they were given class-time over the period of a week to design and build their games. I was a little worried that students would get off topic during class or that they would not have enough to do. I was so wrong! Since they had picked and designed their own games, they were totally invested in working on them; autonomy often leads to students being more focused and successful in school– this project is a prime example of this. During these days, I mainly observed my students as they worked. I did not go up and talk to groups unless they signaled that they needed my (I used the colored red/yellow/green cups that I discussed in this post), as I did not want to interrupt their train of thought, etc. Of course, I became involved if they were off task or if they needed a mediator. However, other than that, I really served as a consultant for their games in the event that they needed some help problem solving something.
During their solo work time, groups were given a set of requirements in which to meet for their game to be considered ready to “invest in”. All games needed to be designed for 4-6 players (the size of my table groups) as well as include: typed up instructions that fully explain the game (including set-up), and all games also needed to be housed in a box. All boxes needed to be sectioned off inside to organize the pieces, the outside needed to include the name of the game, the gaming company, a barcode and price, a description of the game, a fun picture that helps to depict the game and colors (all of these criteria were decided by the students themselves on a discussion the second day; so, again, there was buy-in with students wanting to meet these requirements).
DAY 7 (teacher lead):
The final day! Before students came in (mine always line up outside my classroom in two lines, the straighter line goes in first), they were told that once they entered the classroom, they had only 3 minutes to get their game set up at their table. Students hurried to get their games laid out, set up properly and ready for the “investors” to play. The students actually were the ones who became the investors for the other “game companies”. At each table, I laid out a packet of investor feedback sheets (rubrics) that were based upon the criteria we came up with as a class. I set a timer, and each group got 8 minutes to play each game. Groups rotated around the room, played the games and filled out the feedback form for each of the game companies (as well as filled it out for themselves after they had played everyone else’s games). At the end, we had a couple of minutes for the “investors” to vote on their favorite game after the “companies” got a minute to review their feedback. I was whole-heartedly impressed with the feedback the students gave to one another. Their expanded feedback was thoughtful as well as helpful. They gave great suggestions for improving the games. They were both fair and tough at the same time; they had great perspective for assessing their peers since they had gone through the same process and had high expectations.
This project was not only fun fro my students, but also for me. I was so impressed with what they were able to come up with! The games were incredibly creative and served as a wonderful platform for them to review/study for the upcoming test. Aside from the obvious chemistry lessons embedded in this project, there were many other life lessons that were threaded throughout the experience such as: situational problem solving, managing group structure, leadership, creativity, compromise, listening skills, collaboration and much more! Surprisingly, I only had two problems arise within groups that I needed to get involved with (out of 36 groups total!). Both of the problems were minor and more about hurt feelings that needed to be expressed with an adult mediator present. Other than that, it went smoothly and was a success! I am looking forward to doing this project again next year!
Below are some examples of games that they students created… I hope you enjoy them and perhaps are inspired to do something similar in your own classroom!
-The Ardent Teacher